The
steps of the experimental method are essentially those of the scientific
method. For the sake of clarification, they may be listed as follows:
1.
Selecting and delimiting the problem:
The problems amenable to experimentation generally
can, and should, be converted into a hypothesis that can be verified of refuted
by the experimental data. The variables to be investigated should be defined in
operational terms for example, the scores on a test of acceptable validity.
2. Reviewing the literature.
3. Preparing the experimental design:
While
it should also include a clarification of such basic aspects of the design as
the place and the duration of the experiment, this section should place primary
emphasis on the questions of control, randomization, and replication. Because
of the complexity of an experiment, it is generally advisable to conduct a
pilot study in order to ensure the adequacy of the design.
4. Defining the population:
It
is necessary to define the population precisely so that there can be no
question about the population to which the conclusions are to apply.
5. Carrying out the experiment:
It
is necessary here to insist on close adherence to plans, especially as they
relate to the factors of control, randomization and replication. The duration
of the experiment should be such that the variable under investigation is given
sufficient time to promote changes that can be measured and to nullify the
influence of such extraneous factors as novelty.
6. Measuring the outcomes:
Careful consideration must be given to the
selection of the criterion on the basis of which the results are to be
measured, for the fate of the experiment depends in no small measure on the
fairness of the criterion used.
7. Analyzing and interpreting the outcomes:
The
investigator is concerned with the operation of the factor under study. He must
be especially sensitive to the possibility that the results of his study arose
through the operation of uncontrolled extraneous factors. He must further
exclude, at a given probability level, the possibility that his experimental
findings are simply the results of chance. In no other area of educational
research is the need for competence in statistical procedures
so clearly indicated as in the analysis of experimental data as the basis of
their valid interpretation. Of course, statistics cannot correct fulfils in
the design or overcome inadequacies in the basic data. The investigator must
recognize that statistical tools do not relieve the scientist of his
responsibility for planning the study for controlling extraneous factors and
for obtaining valid and precise measurements. It can also be argued that there
is limited justification for high-powered statistical refinement in the early
exploration of a problem area or in instances where the data involved are
essentially crude and imprecise.
8. Drawing up the conclusions:
The
conclusions of the study must be restricted to the population actually
investigated and care must be taken not to over generalize the results. The
results also pertain only to the conditions under which they were derived and
since control may have distorted the natural situation care must be taken to
restrict the conclusions to the conditions
actually present in the experiment. The investigator must not forget that his
conclusions are based on the concept of probability but especially he must not
fail to recognize the limitations underlying his conclusions and/or the special
conditions that restrict their applicability.
9. Reporting the result:
The
study must be reported in sufficient detail so that the reader can make a
judgement as to its adequacy.
Comments
Post a Comment
any suggestion on my side